Essay on Nicholas Is Foreign Policy - 1474 Words

Maintaining Order The Reign of Nicholas I has been marked with war. He grew up in a time when war was the accepted norm of Russia. As a child he saw his brother fight against the evil, which was Napoleon. With war being part of Nicholas everyday life he quickly became infatuated with it. â€Å"He always remained an army man, a junior officer at heart, devoted to his troops, to military exercises, to the parade ground, down to the last button on a soldiers uniform (Riasanovsky, 323)† Nicholas time growing up in Russia had an immense influence on him. He observed strategy’s like those of Prince Michael Kutuzov, and learned only with proper order can one fully achieve military dominance. Three major conflicts accurately describe how Nicholas I†¦show more content†¦Police held Russia under a microscope, in a coup like state. Committees like the â€Å"Third Section†, and a â€Å"Statute on Censorship† also assisted Nicholas in knowing exactly what his people were doing (Nicholas, 51). Nicholas I fear of liberal thought drove him to not have a reign of reform, but rather one that would merely maintain order. Even issues like serfdom, which he knew was morally wrong, Nicholas’s did not enact reform because of his fear of losing autocracy. â€Å" A single stroke of the sovereign Emperors pen can turn serfs into free men; but no foresight can predict the consequences of such a sudden change, and no power’s will be sufficient to restore order and security amidst general anarchy (Reader, 66).† Nicholas I foreign affairs were run like a carbon copy of how he ran his nation. Alexander influenced him heavily by signing what was called the Holy Alliance. â€Å"Signed on September 26, 1815, by Russia, Austria, and Prussia, and subsequently by the great majority of European powers, the alliance simply appealed to Christian rulers to live as brothers and preserve peace in Europe (Rias., 314).† Nicholas felt that it was his duty to preserve everything that this treaty stood for. He was going to police Europe. Nicholas I did not work alone when representing Russian views. Count KarlShow MoreRelatedThe Romanov Dynasty That Ruled Russia From 16131605 Words   |  7 Pages1613 until 1918 was subject to the period seismic shifts of increasing connection, modernization, and technological advancement that shook the rest of Europe during the same timeframe. The Tsars of this dynasty faced this challenge directly through foreign military conquests and economic and political reforma tion, yet a distinctive foundational element stayed true throughout their reign. Tsars of Russia consistently used a reverence for Orthodoxy to establish a continued persecution of minority religiousRead MoreThe Realpolitik Foreign Policy Of Otto Von Bismarck1723 Words   |  7 PagesThe realpolitik foreign policy of Otto Von Bismarck contained many similarities as well as differences when compared and contrasted to the weltpolitik foreign policy of his successor Kaiser Wilhelm II. In 1890, Wilhelm II forced Bismarck’s resignation and ascended the German throne, leading Germany into a militaristic path, failing to maintain Germany’s allies, and plunging it into one of the most famous wars of history, World War I. Bismarck was originally an expansionist who aimed to make PrussiaRead MoreTsar Nicholas II’s Abdication was Preventable1103 Words   |  4 PagesTsar Nicholas II’s abdication in February 1917 was an event that both he could have prevented, however a number of factors meant it was out of his control. A revolution in Russia was inevitable and Nicolas was hapless to have been crowed a time of liberation; however his personality traits and actions lead to abdication in February 1917. Nicholas’ lack of political understanding was a constant delimitative factor throughout his rule, especially regarding Russia revolutionary stance, the Russo-JapaneseRead MoreEssay about Comparison Of Nicholas I And Nicholas II958 Words   |  4 Pages Nicholas I and Nicholas II both struggled with similar uncertainties of a possible revolution. Both came to a conclusion with a strong resemblance, and yet at the same time remained drastically different when their rule ended. While the names may suggest that Nicholas I was the father of Nicholas II, Nicholas I was actually Nicholas IIamp;#8217;s great granduncle. The summarized history of their terms below will tell of and compare the Nicholasamp;#8217; reigns of the Russian monarchy. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;NicholasRead MoreRussias Peace Policy Essay examples1338 Words   |  6 Pagesthe earth.† If they become insignificant, there is no other country that would be able to stop Russia. This would be a huge problem for the entire world. As Sergei Witte, an advisor for both Alexander III and Nicholas II, noted in his article, â€Å"Program for a Commercial and Industrial Policy†, Russia is an independent and strong power. She has the right and the strength not to want to be the eternal handmaiden of states which are more developed economically†¦She is proud by her great might, by whichRead MoreEssay on Nicholas I1278 Words   |  6 PagesNicholas I Nicholas I has been portrayed, and perhaps rightfully so, as a strict and reactionary tsar. Indeed, his internal policies were often repressive -- he sought to nip any liberalism in the bud, often brutally. His approach to solving problems in the Empire and keeping control was to create the Nicholas system, a bureaucratic system defined by and completely based on absolute monarchy. Nicholas revamped govermental structure by strengthening and centralizing bureaucratic structuresRead MoreThe Tragic Assassination Of The Russian People1372 Words   |  6 Pages The Russian people, on multiple occasions, were desperate for rights and food. With each passing day of the Romanov administration overlooking their people, the people’s faith and loyalty began to waver. Through Nicholas’ incompetence in dealing with social reforms and foreign policies, the tragic assassination of his family was irrevocable. Although it may seem as if Russia’s decline happened overnight, a detailed timeline of Russia’s history would prove quite the opposite. Despite Russia’s longRead MoreThe Occurrence of the 1905 Revolution and the Ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II925 Words   |  4 PagesIneptitude of Tsar Nicholas II The 1905 Revolution in Russia occurred because of a variety of long and short term causes, which led to the Tsar to lose the support of his people. These causes comprised of the economic hardship in Russia, the refusal of the government to broaden their representation, the military failure, and the mishandling of the 1905 crisis, Bloody Sunday. However, the underlying factor in all of these causes is the ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II, as he heldRead MoreThe French And Russian Revolutions1598 Words   |  7 Pagesand Nikolai (Nicholas) Alexandrovich Romanov-a boy who was not taught the proper way to rule and who had fallen in love with his queen at the age of sixteen. Alexandra and Nicholas were star-crossed lovers with disapproval of the romance from both sides. Nicholas’ side condemned the love because of religious differences, and Alexandra’s side disapproved because of an earlier assassination of Nicholas’ grandfather. The two were separated, but when they met a few years later, Nicholas asked AlexandraRead MoreFrom the Russian Empire to the Soviet Union Essay1354 Words   |  6 Pagesruled by tsardom to a totalitarian government and then to a totalitarian state. From the time of 1801 to 1917, Russia was governed by autocratic and enlightened tsars such as Nicholas I and Alexander III. Both feared rebellions and justified their arbitrary use of power wi th censorship. However, after 1917, the reign of Nicholas II, the tsarist regime was replaced with the leader of the Bolshevik party. The government became filled with communist ideals as the significance of Lenin increased. In the