Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Short-Cuts in an Organisational Setting free essay sample

Figures of Quantity. Figures of Quality. Figures of Contrast Essay Example

Figures of Quantity. Figures of Quality. Figures of Contrast Essay Plan 1. Figures of amount: metaphor; meiosis (litotes). 2. Figures of value: metonymy (synecdoche, periphrasis, doublespeak); incongruity. 3. Figures of complexity: confusing expression; absolute opposite. 4. Down to earth task Metonymy, another lexical SD, similar to illustration on losing its innovation likewise gets instrumental in advancing the jargon of the language, however metonymy is made by an alternate semantic procedure and depends on contiguity (proximity) of articles or wonders. Transference of names in metonymy doesn't include a need for two unique words to have a typical segment in their semantic structures, similar to the instance of illustration, however continues from the way that two articles (wonders) have normal grounds of presence as a general rule. Such words as cup and tea have no phonetic semantic proximity, yet the first may serve the holder of the second, henceforth the conversational platitude Will you have another cup? , which is an instance of metonymy, when unique, however because of long use, not any more acknowledged as a new SD. My metal will call your metal, says one of the characters of A. Haileys Airport to another, which means My manager will call your chief. The transference of names is brought about by the two managers being officials, wearing uniform tops with metal knots. The extent of transference in metonymy is significantly more restricted than that of analogy, which is very reasonable: the extent of human creative mind recogn izing two items (wonders, activities) on the grounds of ordinariness of one of their incalculable attributes is vast while genuine relations between objects are increasingly constrained. We will compose a custom exposition test on Figures of Quantity. Figures of Quality. Figures of Contrast explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom paper test on Figures of Quantity. Figures of Quality. Figures of Contrast explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom paper test on Figures of Quantity. Figures of Quality. Figures of Contrast explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer This is the reason metonymy, all in all,- is a less every now and again watched SD, than similitude. Like singling out one specific kind of analogy into the independent SD of exemplification, one sort of metonymy to be specific, the one, which depends on the relations between a section and the entire is frequently seen autonomously as synecdoche. Generally speaking, metonymy is communicated by things (less much of the time by substantivized numerals) and is utilized in linguistic capacities normal for things (subject, object, predicative). Exercise II. Show metonymies, express the sort of relations between the article named and the bject suggested, which they speak to, lso focus on the level of their innovation, and to their grammatical capacity: 1. He approached her room, after his presentation, seeing her photos, her bronzes and muds, soliciting after the maker from this, the painter of that, where a third thing originated from. (Dr. ) 2. She needed to have a ton of kids, and she w as happy that things were that way, that the Church endorsed. At that point the young lady passed on. Nancy broke with Rome the day her child kicked the bucket. It was a mystery break, however no Catholic breaks with Rome coolly. (J. Goodness. 3. Evelyn Glasgow, get up out of that seat this moment. The young lady turned upward from her book. Whats the issue? Your glossy silk. The skirtll be a mass of wrinkles in the back. (E. F. ) 4. Aside from an absence of youth, the visitors had no normal subject, they appeared outsiders among outsiders; without a doubt, each face, on entering, had strayed to hide alarm at seeing others there. (T. C. ) 5. She saw around her, bunched about the white tables, huge numbers of viciously red lips, powdered cheeks, chilly, hard eyes, reserved presumptuous countenances, and impolite chests. (A. B. 6. Dinah, a thin, new, pale eighteen, was malleable but delicate. (?. ?. ) 7. The man looked a somewhat old forty-five, for he was at that point going dim. (K. P. ) 8. The shop proprietor was a nimble and carefree fifty. (T. R. ) 9. It was simpler to accept a character without lying and you carried an open-minded perspective and brain to the activity. (P. ) 10. Some amazing pictures in this room, honorable men. A Holbein, two Van Dycks and in the event that I am not mixed up, a Velasquez. I am keen on pictures. (Ch. ) 11. You have no one to fault yet yourself. The saddest expressions of tongue or pen. (I. Sh. ) 12. For a few days he took an hour after his work to make request taking with him a few instances of his pen and inks. (Dr. ) 13. There you are at your stunts once more. The remainder of them do win their bread; you live on my foundation. (E. Br. ) 14. I crossed a high cost connect and arranged a no keeps an eye ashore and went to where the Stars and Stripes stood side by side with the Union Jack. (J. St. ) 15. The commendation was eager enough to have pleased any normal essayist who acquires his living by his pen. S. M. ) 16. He cleared his path through the fragrance and discussion. (I. Sh. ) 17. His psyche was alarm and individuals approached him to supper not for bygone eras purpose, but since he was deserving at least some respect. (S. M. ) 18. Up the Square, from the side of King Street, passed a lady in another hat with pink strings, and another blue dress that inclined at the shoulders and developed to an immense circuit at t he stitch. Through the quiet sunlit isolation of the Square this hood and this dress drifted northwards looking for sentiment. (A. B. ) 19. Two men in outfits were running vigorously to the Administration building. As they ran, Christian saw them discard their rifles. They were heavy men who resembled notices for Munich brew, and running came hard to them. The primary detainee halted and got one of the disposed of rifles. He didn't fire it, yet conveyed it, as he pursued the watchmen. He swung the rifle like a club, and one of the lager ads went down (I. Sh. ) Litotes is a two-part structure in which two refutations are joined to give a positive assessment. Along these lines not heartlessly really implies sympathetic, however the beneficial outcome is debilitated and some absence of the speakers trust in his announcement is suggested. The primary segment of a litotes is consistently the negative molecule not, while the second, constantly negative in semantics, shifts in structure from a contrarily joined word (as above) to a negative expression. Litotes is particularly expressive when the semantic focus of the entire †¢ structure is elaborately or/and sincerely hued, as on account of the accompanying periodic manifestations: Her face was not unhandsome (A. H. ) or Her face was not unpretty. K. K. ) The capacity of litotes shares much for all intents and purpose with that of modest representation of the truth both debilitate the impact of the expression. The uniqueness of litotes lies in its particular twofold negative structure and in its debilitating just the positive assessment. The Russian expression compares just to the Engli sh modest representation of the truth as it has no auxiliary or semantic restrictions. Exercise IV. Break down the structure, the semantics and the capacities oflitotes: 1. To be a decent on-screen character, she should consistently work for reality in what shes playing, the man said in a voice not vacant of self esteem. N. M. ) 2. Better believe it, what the heck, Anne said and seeing me, gave that not unsour grin. (R. W. ) 3. It was not unnatural if Gilbert felt a specific humiliation. (E. W. ) 4. The thought was not absolutely wrong. The idea didn't disappoint me. (I. M. ) 5. I was tranquil, yet not uncommunicative; saved, yet not antisocial; lively now and again, yet rare excited. (Jn. B. ) 6. He had all the trust on the planet, and not without reason. (J. Gracious. ) 7. Kirsten said not without respect: Too much talking is impulsive. (Ch. ) 8. No, Ive had a calling and afterward a firm to value, said Ravenstreet, not without harshness. (P. ) 9. I believed I wouldnt disapprove o f some tea. (K. M. ) 10. I wouldnt disapprove of going out to see the films. (E. W. ) 11. I dont think youve been excessively hopeless, my dear. (P. ) 12. Still fourteen days of progress is certainly not nothing and calls were rolling in from specialists for seven days. (Ph. R. ) ASSIGNMENTS FOR SELF-CONTROL 1. What is a litotes? 2. What is there in like manner among litotes and modest representation of the truth? 3. Depict most every now and again utilized structures of litotes. Periphrasis is an extremely impossible to miss elaborate gadget which essentially comprises of utilizing an indirect type of articulation rather than a less difficult one, I. e. of utilizing a pretty much muddled linguistic structure rather than a word. Contingent upon the component of this replacement, periphrases are characterized into non-literal (metonymic and figurative), and legitimate. The main gathering is made, truth be told, of expression metonymies and expression representations, as you may well observe from the accompanying model: The medical clinic was packed with the carefully fascinating results of the battling with regards to Africa (I. Sh. ) where the all-encompassing metonymy represents the injured. Consistent periphrases are phrases synonymic with the words which were subbed by periphrases: Mr. Du Pont was wearing the regular mask with which Brooks Brothers spread the disgrace of American tycoons. (M. St. ) The traditional camouflage remains here for the suit and the disgrace of American moguls †for the paunch (the stomach). Since the immediate selection of the not very rich component of appearance was subbed by an indirect portrayal this periphrasis might be likewise viewed as metaphorical, as it offers a progressively amiable capability rather than a coarser one. The principle capacity of periphrases is to pass on a simply singular impression of the depicted article. To accomplish it the by and large acknowledged designation of the item is supplanted by the portrayal of one of its highlights or characteristics, which appears to the creator generally significant for the trait of the article, and which in this manner becomes foregrounded. The regularly rehashed periphrases become trite a

Book Riots Deals of the Day for August 4th, 2019

Book Riot’s Deals of the Day for August 4th, 2019 Sponsored by Book Riots Tailored Book Recommendation service! These deals were active as of this writing, but may expire soon, so get them while they’re hot! Todays  Featured Deals In the Woods by Tana French for $1.99. Get it here, or just click on the cover image below. The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafón and translated by Lucia Graves for $1.99. Get it here, or just click on the cover image below. Mind Platter by Najwa Zebian for $1.99. Get it here, or just click on the cover image below. In Case You Missed Yesterdays Most Popular Deals The Wedding Date by Jasmine Guillory for $1.99. Get it here,  or just click on the cover image below. The Murders of Molly Southbourne by Tade Thompson for $3.99. Get it here,  or just click on the cover image below. Previous Daily Deals That Are Still Active As Of This Writing (Get em While Theyre hot!): An Untamed State by Roxane Gay for $2.99 The Calculating Stars by Mary Robinette Kowal for $2.99 Girl, Interrupted by Susanna Kaysen for $2.99 Drop the Ball: Achieving More by Doing Less by Tiffany Dufu for $2.99 The Hunger by Alma Katsu for $1.99 Black Boy by Richard Wright for $1.99 Temper by Nicky Drayden for $1.99 Girls of Paper and Fire by Natasha Ngan for $2.99 Feel Free by Zadie Smith for $3.99 The Cutting Season by Attica Locke for $1.99. New Suns: Original Speculative Fiction by People of Color Edited By Nisi Shawl for $0.99. Mapping the Interior by Stephen Graham Jones for $3.99 The Casquette Girls by Alys Arden for $0.99 The Bees by Laline Paull for $1.99 The Unexpected Inheritance of Inspector Chopra  by Vaseem Khan for $2.99 Grace and Fury  by Tracy Banghart for $2.99 Shuri (2018 #1)  by Nnedi Okorafor for $1.99 The Only Harmless Great Thing by Brooke Bolander for $1.99 Sing, Unburied, Sing by Jesmyn Ward for $2.99 Rosewater by Tade Thompson for $2.99 Family Trust  by Kathy Wang for $1.99 The Black Gods Drums by P. Djèlí Clark for $1.99 Gods, Monsters, and the Lucky Peach by Kelly Robson for $1.99 My Soul to Keep by Tananarive Due for $0.99 All Systems Red: The Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells for $3.99 Jade City by Fonda Lee for $2.99 Here to Stay by Sara Farizan  for $1.99 A Big Ship at the Edge of the Universe by Alex White  for $2.99 Silver in the Wood by Emily Tesh for $3.99 A Curious Beginning  by Deanna Raybourn  for $2.99 Storm Front  by Jim Butcher (Book One of the Dresden Files)  for $2.99 Guapa  by Saleem Haddad for $1.99 Hogwarts: an Incomplete and Unreliable Guide  by J.K. Rowling  for $2.99 Short Stories from Hogwarts  by J.K. Rowling  for $2.99 The Paper Magician by Charlie N. Holmberg for $1.99 The Girl with the Red Balloon by Katherine Locke  for $1.99 The Invisible Library by Genevieve Cogman for $0.99 Half-Resurrection Blues by Daniel José Older for $2.99 Cant Escape Love by Alyssa Cole for $1.99 Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman for $0.99. The Haunting of Tram Car 015 by P. Djèlí Clark for $3.99 A Quiet Life in the Country by T E Kinsey for $3.99 Empire of Sand by Tasha Suri for $4.99 Life and Death in Shanghai by Nien Cheng for $4.99 Binti  by Nnedi Okorafor for $1.99 Binti: Home  by Nnedi Okorafor for $2.99 Binti: The Night Masquerade by Nnedi Okorafor for $3.99 Instant Pot ®  Obsession: The Ultimate Electric Pressure Cooker Cookbook for Cooking Everything Fast by Janet A. Zimmerman for $2.99 Tell the Truth Shame the Devil by Lezley McSpadden with Lyah Beth LeFlore for $0.99 Magic Bites by Ilona Andrews for $2.99 Once Ghosted, Twice Shy by Alyssa Cole for  $1.99 Whatever Happened to Interracial Love? by Kathleen Collins for $3.99 In Search of Lost Time: Volumes 1-7  by Marcel Proust  for $0.99 Prime Meridian  by Silvia Moreno-Garcia for $3.99 The Mirror Empire by Kameron Hurley for $2.99 I Met a Traveller in an Antique Land  by Connie Willis for $0.99 Soy Sauce for Beginners by Kirstin Chen for $3.99 Silver Phoenix by Cindy Pon for $2.99 A Curious Beginning by Deanna Raybourn for $2.99 George by Alex Gino for $3.99 Destinys Captive by Beverly Jenkins for $1.99 A Rogue By Any Other Name by Sarah MacLean for $1.99 The Price of Salt by Patricia Highsmith for $0.99 Sign up for our Book Deals newsletter and get up to 80% off books you actually want to read.

The Prentice Hall s Self Assessment And The Holly Bible

What’s your personality? Are you an optimist who sees the glass half full or are you the person who gets invited to social settings because you’re the life of the party? The word personality or phrases associated with personality conjure emotions affecting behavior and attitudes. A person’s personality is more than a phrase it’s a result of factors and situations. This paper will attempt to explain my personality according to the results of the Prentice Hall’s Self-Assessment and the Holly Bible. I use the word attempt because doing a self-assessment can be subjective depending on a variety of circumstances and emotions. Edgar’s Self-Assessment What about Me My Jungian Type Personality The Prentice Hall’s Self-Assessment test†¦show more content†¦My personality preferences are influenced by my spiritual, emotional, and physical needs. I came to the conclusion the different Jungian Personality results were due to my emotional mode and physical condition. The most recent time I took the personality test, I was well rested and in good health. The initial personality test, I was sick with a cold and had driven three hundred miles earlier in the day. A combination of the long road trip and suffering with the cold symptoms resulted in varying test results. Physical fitness levels and physical stamina affect emotions and affected my personality type results. How Involved am I in my Job? The results for the Prentice Hall’s Self-Assessment, how involved am I in my job listed my score of forty-five. The test, results indicated I have relatively high job involvement. My job consumes large amounts of time and effort. While taking the test, the questions prompted me to think about the level of commitment I have to my job versus my family. Before taking the self-assessment, I was in the belief my work and family commitments were divided appropriately. A few months ago I had a conversation with my wife about the level of involvement with my professional life versus my family. I gave several examples of how I dropped everything at work and came home to handle family-related problems and emergencies in an attempt to debate her examples. As I was taking the self-assessment test, I remembered my conversation

The Theory Of Scientific Abuse - 929 Words

Scientific Abuse Darwin, the name widely recognized as the grandfather of evolution, describes evolution as â€Å"organ, instinct, or any whole being...arriving at its present state by many graduated steps† (Darwin 158). The struggle for survival forces organisms to evolve gradually and adapt to their environment, therefore increasing their chances of survival. Darwin furthers his theories into the origins of species in which he explains how â€Å"several breeds to which each has attended, are descended from aboriginally distinct species† (Darwin 103). The observation of the animals suggests that they further originate from a single ancestor. Darwin’s points are biological in nature. Other notable scientific figures have built upon Darwin’s idea in†¦show more content†¦Spencer then points out how the evolved â€Å"division of labor† characterizes an â€Å"advanced nation† and the more society move towards specialization, the better it is as a whole. Similarly, Galton talks about the evolution of society as whole, however, he brings up methodologies in which society can be improved. He states â€Å"The possibility of improving the race of a nation depends on the power of increasing the productivity of the best stock† (Galton 24). In simple terms, the level at which society improves is determined by how well the upper class can reproduce. Galton is, thereby, implying selective parenthood. In theory, as generation continue, the increase in intellects would result in a more able society. Adding on to Galton, in the early 20th century, Davenport puts the use of â€Å"human harvest† in his study of eugenics. He singles out the criminal minded, the feeble-minded, the mentally ill, and the impoverished groups in society. He proposes â€Å"control by the state of propagation of the mentally incompetent† (Davenport 4). He does, however, qualify that he does not mean control by means of extermination, but sterilization of the â€Å"mentally incompetent† is not out of reach. Davenport believes that such â€Å"characteristics are inheritable ... and they may be combined in any desirable mosaic† suggesting selective breeding of the human population in order to build a better class of humans. The ideas of

Fires on the Plain a Reflection Free Essays

Fires on The Plain: A Reflection Fires on the Plain is truly the most depressing, haunting, and sad story I have ever endured reading. The complete abandonment of the Japanese soldiers on the island of Leyte by the Japanese Army is revolting, as well as the complete disregard for each others well being among them. It becomes a battle between one another for survival. We will write a custom essay sample on Fires on the Plain: a Reflection or any similar topic only for you Order Now The lack of comradery among the Japanese soldiers is dumbfounding, and leads me to believe that it may very well have been there demise. The weaknesses we see in Tamura and the other soldiers not only have a great impact on their unfortunate outcome, but are also a result of a weakness within the Japanese Army itself. The awful fate of these soldiers, at the hands of their own command, is infuriating. Shohei’s story holds powerful, and several dangerous implications of what war is like and what it’s effects can be on those who fight in them. I would like to start by talking about comradery. Comradery can be defined as the spirit of friendship and community in a group, like a group of soldiers. Tamura’s story shows zero evidence of any sort of comradeship, he even describes the way in which it he saw it disappear on Leyte, â€Å"Before long any comradeship that we once felt for each other had virtually disappeared. †(pg. 9). I could also see this in the way they treated each other. Initially, Yasuda and Nagamatsus’ relationship could be mistaken for comradeship, but I realized that they were only using each other and did not care at all about the others well being. Which becomes quite clear at the end of the book. I have no doubt that this complete lack of comradery was mostly a result of their horrific situation, but I also believe that it could have existed before it. The way in which Tamura laughed while watching his fellow soldiers run around like â€Å"insects†(pg. 59), and the fact that Nagamatsu would hunt, kill, and eat his fellow soldiers are disturbing examples of the complete disregard they had for one another. These instances serve as proof to me that there couldn’t possibly have been much of a comradeship between these men at any point. One dangerous implication that this story holds expressed directly by Shohei, â€Å"For people like us, living day and night on the brink of danger, the normal instinct of survival seems to strike inward, like a disease, distorting the personality and removing all motives other than those of sheer self-interest. †(pg. 9). While this certainly seems true for the Japanese soldiers in this story, I refuse to believe it to be true for all men. My personal experiences from being a Marine and doing two tours in Afghanistan have showed me what true comradery is. My fellow Marines and I would have gladly died for one another, and some did. In class, we discussed how the way in which these Japanese soldiers turned on one another when torn down to their most animalistic nature, could be true of all men or soldiers when under the same circumstances. The fact that somebody could believe that to be true is not only offensive, but scary. It is scary to me that examples from a book written by someone who is clearly insane, could be generalized to all men or all soldiers of every kind. What really irks me about this is that Shohei, portrayed through Tamura, shows absolutely no characteristics of a soldier. I think his most accurate depiction was when he said they resembled domestic animals â€Å"helplessly uprooted and perplexed†(pg. 35). I believe that he portrays someone with certain mental weakness. He wonders about the island countryside, it seams, waiting for his death to come. He has no plan but death. I understand that his circumstances are beyond my understanding, but they way in which he so easily abandons any hope of surviving, and doesn’t put up any real fight for his survival, doesn’t sit with me. It makes me realize that this weakness is most likely due to reasons beyond his control, such as the way in which, and the culture in which, he was brought up. As well as the poor military training and/or lack there of, did not properly prepare him for the nightmare of a situation he was put in. Which forces me to re-evaluate my initial reaction to write him off as a pathetic, weak individual who should have shot himself right then and there after he murdered the Filipino women. I am sympathetic for poor Tamura, who was drafted into the army and clearly given incredibly insufficient training. Tamura did not belong there and, I feel, none of them belonged there. The infuriating part of this story is the way in which these men were sent to what any person with intellect could tell was a certain, horrific death. Not only were they ordered to go that island, to that shit hole of a situation, it seams as if the people who ordered them there just left them for dead. Even his commanding officer told him that the best thing he could for his country was kill himself. They were given absolutely no support against an enemy whose support was rivaled by none. Which resulted in them fighting each other for survival. Fires on the Plain is a very disturbing story from a war that resulted in many awful things. It has many implications of what war can be like, but I want to emphasize that not all wars are the same, and the men and women who fight in these wars certainly are not either. I would hope that those who read this understand that they shouldn’t generalize the behavior of these poor Japanese soldiers to all soldiers or fighting men. I believe that the circumstances surrounding this horrific example of what war can be like are incredible and the ingredients that went into making this shit sandwich are hard to come by all at the same time. My final thoughts of this story are wrapped around Shohei’s idea that life is nothing more than â€Å"a mere succession of chances†(p. 233). I have been debating over this idea with myself ever since I came back from my last tour in Afghanistan, and I can’t say that Shohei’s story has helped me in making a decision. How to cite Fires on the Plain: a Reflection, Essay examples

Fires on the Plain a Reflection Free Essays

Fires on The Plain: A Reflection Fires on the Plain is truly the most depressing, haunting, and sad story I have ever endured reading. The complete abandonment of the Japanese soldiers on the island of Leyte by the Japanese Army is revolting, as well as the complete disregard for each others well being among them. It becomes a battle between one another for survival. We will write a custom essay sample on Fires on the Plain: a Reflection or any similar topic only for you Order Now The lack of comradery among the Japanese soldiers is dumbfounding, and leads me to believe that it may very well have been there demise. The weaknesses we see in Tamura and the other soldiers not only have a great impact on their unfortunate outcome, but are also a result of a weakness within the Japanese Army itself. The awful fate of these soldiers, at the hands of their own command, is infuriating. Shohei’s story holds powerful, and several dangerous implications of what war is like and what it’s effects can be on those who fight in them. I would like to start by talking about comradery. Comradery can be defined as the spirit of friendship and community in a group, like a group of soldiers. Tamura’s story shows zero evidence of any sort of comradeship, he even describes the way in which it he saw it disappear on Leyte, â€Å"Before long any comradeship that we once felt for each other had virtually disappeared. †(pg. 9). I could also see this in the way they treated each other. Initially, Yasuda and Nagamatsus’ relationship could be mistaken for comradeship, but I realized that they were only using each other and did not care at all about the others well being. Which becomes quite clear at the end of the book. I have no doubt that this complete lack of comradery was mostly a result of their horrific situation, but I also believe that it could have existed before it. The way in which Tamura laughed while watching his fellow soldiers run around like â€Å"insects†(pg. 59), and the fact that Nagamatsu would hunt, kill, and eat his fellow soldiers are disturbing examples of the complete disregard they had for one another. These instances serve as proof to me that there couldn’t possibly have been much of a comradeship between these men at any point. One dangerous implication that this story holds expressed directly by Shohei, â€Å"For people like us, living day and night on the brink of danger, the normal instinct of survival seems to strike inward, like a disease, distorting the personality and removing all motives other than those of sheer self-interest. †(pg. 9). While this certainly seems true for the Japanese soldiers in this story, I refuse to believe it to be true for all men. My personal experiences from being a Marine and doing two tours in Afghanistan have showed me what true comradery is. My fellow Marines and I would have gladly died for one another, and some did. In class, we discussed how the way in which these Japanese soldiers turned on one another when torn down to their most animalistic nature, could be true of all men or soldiers when under the same circumstances. The fact that somebody could believe that to be true is not only offensive, but scary. It is scary to me that examples from a book written by someone who is clearly insane, could be generalized to all men or all soldiers of every kind. What really irks me about this is that Shohei, portrayed through Tamura, shows absolutely no characteristics of a soldier. I think his most accurate depiction was when he said they resembled domestic animals â€Å"helplessly uprooted and perplexed†(pg. 35). I believe that he portrays someone with certain mental weakness. He wonders about the island countryside, it seams, waiting for his death to come. He has no plan but death. I understand that his circumstances are beyond my understanding, but they way in which he so easily abandons any hope of surviving, and doesn’t put up any real fight for his survival, doesn’t sit with me. It makes me realize that this weakness is most likely due to reasons beyond his control, such as the way in which, and the culture in which, he was brought up. As well as the poor military training and/or lack there of, did not properly prepare him for the nightmare of a situation he was put in. Which forces me to re-evaluate my initial reaction to write him off as a pathetic, weak individual who should have shot himself right then and there after he murdered the Filipino women. I am sympathetic for poor Tamura, who was drafted into the army and clearly given incredibly insufficient training. Tamura did not belong there and, I feel, none of them belonged there. The infuriating part of this story is the way in which these men were sent to what any person with intellect could tell was a certain, horrific death. Not only were they ordered to go that island, to that shit hole of a situation, it seams as if the people who ordered them there just left them for dead. Even his commanding officer told him that the best thing he could for his country was kill himself. They were given absolutely no support against an enemy whose support was rivaled by none. Which resulted in them fighting each other for survival. Fires on the Plain is a very disturbing story from a war that resulted in many awful things. It has many implications of what war can be like, but I want to emphasize that not all wars are the same, and the men and women who fight in these wars certainly are not either. I would hope that those who read this understand that they shouldn’t generalize the behavior of these poor Japanese soldiers to all soldiers or fighting men. I believe that the circumstances surrounding this horrific example of what war can be like are incredible and the ingredients that went into making this shit sandwich are hard to come by all at the same time. My final thoughts of this story are wrapped around Shohei’s idea that life is nothing more than â€Å"a mere succession of chances†(p. 233). I have been debating over this idea with myself ever since I came back from my last tour in Afghanistan, and I can’t say that Shohei’s story has helped me in making a decision. How to cite Fires on the Plain: a Reflection, Essay examples